Month: May 2020

Tulare woman released on $0 bail, reoffends days later

A Tulare woman was arraigned last week on a theft charge after having been released from custody on $0 bail as part of the judicial branch’s emergency orders concerning COVID-19.

Nikki Gonzales, age 32, was arrested on May 5 after allegedly stealing items at a Tulare drugstore. In 2020 alone, Gonzales has been charged with 12 separate misdemeanor cases, which include charges for possession of stolen property, petty theft, trespassing, shoplifting, resisting/delaying arrest, under the influence of narcotics, drunk in public and looting. Gonzales was granted $0 bail under the Emergency Bail Schedule having been released on three separate occasions prior to arrest on the latest charges. She was last released on April 29th, 2020, before being arrested less than a week later on May 5th, 2020.

On May 7, she was arraigned on a new misdemeanor charge of looting. She pleaded not guilty. In total, Gonzales has 14 open criminal cases including the recent misdemeanor charge. Her most serious case alleges two felony counts of bringing both drugs and weapons into the jail.

Her next court date is May 26, 2020, to set a preliminary hearing on her felony case.

Pre-Trial Supervision

Agents contact offenders in the community to monitor compliance with bail terms and conditions.

Community Contacts With Defendants

  • Face to Face Contact
  • In Office Contact
  • Cell Phone App Contact

Compliance Checks

  • Unannounced Visits To Verify Information
  • Unannounced Home Visit
  • Bail Application Updates
  • Bail Term & Condition Compliance Check


GPS Services Agents To Monitor Bail Compliance

  • Home/Jail/Workplace Installation
  • Tamper Response Teams
  • 24/7 Live Operator Monitoring

These are highly intrusive forms of bail supervision in which the offender is very closely monitored. It is common for violent criminals, gang members, habitual offenders, and sex offenders to be supervised at this level. Some may be subject to unannounced home or workplace visits, surveillance, and the use of electronic monitoring or satellite tracking.


Fugitive Arrest Response Team

Flat Rate Local Recovery Services: $4,500.00 per month plus $500 per case


Local Cases starting at 10%

Out of County Cases starting at 15%

Out of State Cases starting at 20%

Out of County Cases starting at 25% plus advance costs.


  • The average age of our agents is over 30 years with at least 3 years of experience in either law enforcement, private investigation, or fugitive recovery.
  • Our agents have earned a degree or have completed at least 60 units of coursework.
  • We close more cases than any of our competitors.
  • We are in full compliance with AB-5 (meaning you won’t need to treat contract recovery agents as employees.)

California Sheriff: Effects of Zero Bail Requirement ‘Could be Devastating’ San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon and District Attorney Jason Anderson voiced opposition Thursday to a court rule they say will lead to the release of hundreds of county inmates, including some who pose a danger to the community.

SAN BERNARDINO — County Sheriff John McMahon and District Attorney Jason Anderson voiced opposition Thursday to a court rule they say will lead to the release of hundreds of county inmates, including some who pose a danger to the community.

The rule, approved by the Judicial Council of California last week, requires that bail for people accused of certain misdemeanor and felony offenses be set at $0. The rule applies to both new arrestees and people already in custody.

People charged with serious or violent offenses such as murder, rape, or robbery are not eligible.

The Council said in a statement the rule would “safely reduce jail populations” amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Prisons have been linked to concentrated outbreaks of COVID-19 cases as officials grapple to contain its spread. At a state prison in Chino, 51 inmates and 22 staff members have tested positive for the virus, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation reported Friday.

“In developing these rules, we listened to suggestions from our justice system partners, the public, and the courts, and we greatly appreciate all of the input,” said Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, chair of the Council. “Working with our court stakeholders, I’m confident we can preserve the rule of law and protect the rights of victims, the accused, litigants, families and children, and all who seek justice. It’s truly a team effort.”

In separate Facebook videos, McMahon and Anderson criticized the decision.

In the District Attorney’s video, ominous music played at the beginning as a text graphic read: “The California Judicial Council has ordered the release of certain inmates into the community solely because of COVID-19. Some of these inmates are a threat to your safety…”

According to Anderson, inmates who have remained in custody and could be released are “some of the worst of the worst.” He said the judicial order doesn’t take into account those accused of child or elder abuse and prior convictions.

Inmates released due to COVID-19? You read that right. Join @sheriffmcmahon , @sbcountysheriff and our office in sending a unified message that this is unacceptable for San Bernardino County! #zerobail #unifiedmessage #thinblueline

— San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office (@sbcountyda) April 17, 2020

McMahon said, as a result of the zero bail requirement, an inmate who had been arrested on suspicion of felony child abuse — and who had prior convictions of child abuse and domestic violence — had been released and scheduled to appear in court.

“Based on this process, we are unable to hold this criminal in custody to ensure he does not recontact, live with or cause additional harm to the victim,” McMahon said. “The effects of zero bail on the county could be devastating.”

.@SheriffMcMahon and @sbcountyda Jason Anderson strongly oppose the Judicial Council’s ruling to blindly gift $0 bail! This approach is short-sided & not in the best interest of public safety.

See the DA’s message: @sbcountyda

— San Bernardino County Sheriff (@sbcountysheriff) April 17, 2020

Sheriff’s spokesperson Cindy Bachman said more than 500 inmates could have their charges reviewed and decided on, with an estimated 7 to 10 new arrestees a day fitting the zero-bail criteria.

County Public Defender G. Christopher Gardner said he doesn’t believe county residents should be in fear, however, as “the worst of the worst are in jail for charges that aren’t allowed zero bail.”

The Judicial Council rule makes those people charged with serious or violent felonies; allegedly violated a protective order; made felony criminal threats; resisted an executive officer; or are accused of other offenses exempt from qualifying for zero bail.

Gardner said since the order was enacted Monday, about 80 to 100 inmates had been released with the approval of his office, the District Attorney’s, and the court’s.

“I don’t think there’s reason to be scared for the community in the way that we’re handling this,” the public defender said. “I understand [McMahon’s and Anderson’s] point of view, but I don’t think the citizens of San Bernardino should be afraid of the way it’s set up because I think our law and justice system is doing it in a very prudent matter … We’re not just opening the doors and letting people out. That’s not happening.”

Gardner said inmates the public defenders and prosecutors disagreed on releasing would face a hearing and have a judge decide next week. The rule doesn’t restrict the ability of judges to deny bail.

Inmates who are eligible for zero bail already have a bail set, Gardner said, but they remained in jail because they couldn’t afford it.

“They’re essentially locked in jail right now because their bail is too high, not because they’re a danger to the community,” he said.

In his video, Sheriff McMahon also questioned the releasing of zero-bail inmates due to COVID-19 as his jails have only reported one positive case in an inmate as of Friday.

He said the jail population was lower than average, which allowed more bed space to isolate and quarantine inmates suspected of contracting the virus.

“Inmates in our custody receive excellent medical treatment and oftentimes have access to health care more readily than those in jail,” he said.

On Friday, the Sheriff’s Department reported that a 10th employee — a nurse who works in corrections — had tested positive for COVID-19.

That would make seven Sheriff’s employees who work in corrections that have contracted the virus, according to Bachman.

She said measures to prevent the spread include taking temperatures of everyone who enters the jail and screening arrestees to determine whether they have flu-like symptoms or have been exposed to the coronavirus.

Bachman added inmates and staff had been issued face coverings and given soap donated by local hotels to frequently wash their hands. Visits and programs and also been suspended.

After Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an order on March 24 to temporarily suspend intake of inmates into state prisons from the counties due to coronavirus concerns, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations announced it would be releasing thousands of incarcerated people to early parole.

State prison officials said Monday the prison population had been reduced by more than 6,700 inmates.

Those infected with COVID-19 in state prisons include 81 inmates and 88 staff members, according to CDCR data as of Friday.

Martin Estacio may be reached at or at 760-955-5358. Follow him on Twitter @DP_mestacio.

Transient found in vehicle stolen during a residential burglary released on zero-bail

VICTORVILLE, Calif. ( — A 26-year-old transient found inside a stolen vehicle was arrested and released on $0 bail after the booking process, officials said.

On May 24, 2020, at about 11:53 am, a deputy with the Victorville Police Department conducted a vehicle check on a 2014 Hyundai Elantra parked in the desert area near Roy Rogers and Civic Drive.

It was found to be a stolen vehicle and was occupied by Earl Prescott Thomas

Sheriff’s spokeswoman Mara Rodriguez said the vehicle was stolen during a residential burglary. “Sometime between May 3 & May 23, while the owner was away, the home was broken into. Multiple items were stolen from the residence, including a vehicle,” stated Rodriguez.

Thomas was arrested and booked at High Desert Detention Center for possession of a stolen vehicle.

In compliance with the statewide Emergency Bail Schedule, his bail was set at $0 and he was released after the booking process.

‘Zero Bail Fail’; Alameda County Suspect Jailed 4 Times Since March, Released Each Time

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) — The Alameda County Sheriff’s Office is publicizing the latest arrest of a man who has been arrested multiple times and released on zero bail, only to be arrested again.

Last month, the California Judicial Council issued an order in an effort to protect inmates’ health during the new coronavirus pandemic by reducing overcrowding at jails. Law enforcement agencies and local prosecutors have railed against the zero bail releases of suspects, and say some of those being released should not be eligible for bail and are often repeat offenders while out on bail. However, an appeals court ruled defendants can still be held without bail on a judge’s order despite the zero bail policy. Police and prosecutors would need to get the suspect to court to argue against release in front of a judge. In response to comments on the social media posts that the sheriff’s office was simply using Crowder’s image to fit a narrative without offering him help, the sheriff’s office responded, “We would like an opportunity to intervene and get a fighting chance to get reoffenders into sobriety, rehab programs, education and other services we provide. The Zero Bail does not allow us to hit pause and start those services. We want to help these folks not see them reoffend.”

SB 10 is the wrong replacement for California’s unjust money bail system

Source: Sac Bee

To the editor: Your editorial is right to call for “better justice before trial for defendants with or without money.” Unfortunately, your support of Senate Bill 10, which is headed for a referendum in 2020, is misguided.

Eliminating cash bail is urgent and necessary, but we must ensure we’re not replacing one bad bail system with another.

While SB 10 would eliminate cash bail and appear to attack wealth-based detention, it also embraces a system of algorithms based on statistical models that are used to determine who is in and who is out before trial. Like cash bail, this attempt at predicting future behavior turns the presumption of innocence on its head and can result in jail time before a court has evaluated any evidence against you.

Prominent researchers and scientists from leading academic institutions recently argued in a letter to officials in California that these tools “suffer from serious technical flaws that undermine their accuracy, validity, and effectiveness.” The algorithms rely on historical criminal justice data that are riddled with racial and economic disparities.

The choice is not SB 10 or the current system. We have an opportunity to reimagine pretrial justice. Let’s not miss our chance.

Robin Steinberg, Marina del Rey